New to Red Hill Harvest – Build Your Own Subscription Box! Click here to learn more!

Farm Stewardship at Red Hill Harvest

written by

Nathan Masser

posted on

April 17, 2024


Last Easter, I shared the fact that we always try our best to nurture our community and environment through decisions based on our faith, ancestorial knowledge, and new information gained from experience and education.

I want to share with you, exactly how we do this day in and day out on our farm.

Before we get started I do have a brief disclaimer.

How our farm operates is not the only way or the perfect way to farm. However, we strive to do what is best for our farm, with the resources we have available, and to be good stewards of our land and animals.

We understand every farm and situation is different. We want to share the steps that we take to make sure we are putting the safest and most delicious food on your table for generations to come.

Now that that is out of the way, let's begin with how we care for our animals.

Animals

Daily Pasture Moves

I'm sure while taking a drive through the countryside, you've seen a pasture grazed down to nothing. It may be eaten to a length shorter then your lawn, leaving nothing but dust and dirt to try to regrow.

We avoid leaving our soils in this state of despair by moving the animals daily. Whether it be our chickens or cows, we arrange fencing in a way that keeps them from grazing an area of land too much.

We allow them to eat no more then 50% of the grass which helps the pastures to regrow quicker, allowing us to utilize our farm more efficiently as well as keep their stomachs full of high protein, nutrient dense plants.

We also allow the pasture to fully recover before we return to graze again (usually around 60 days, but it could be longer depending on the weather and time of year). This way we improve our pasture resource instead of degrading it.

Space per animal

Space for animals can be a big issue on the farm. To keep the business profitable, it is important to maximize the amount of animals per acre.

The number of cattle we run becomes incredibly hard to manage because, during the spring/fall, when the grass is growing at a rapid pace, we could feed up to 200 head of cattle, whereas in the summer/winter, when the grass is growing very slowly or not at all, 50 head would be a much more suitable number. We typically end up running around 110 head in the spring and decrease the amount throughout the summer and into winter to match our land's carrying capacity.

We like to feed as little amount of hay as possible by keeping the animals grazing out on the pasture, where they were designed to be. When the cattle are out grazing, they have the freedom to roam over the acre or two we have them temporarily fenced into, giving them plenty of space while still improving our land and giving it the rest it needs before regrazing.

Low-Stress Handling

We have about 250 acres of land, spread across 3 separate farms, fenced in for our cattle. Thankfully, 2 of them are adjacent to each other, so we can walk the cows across the road. However, to get to the other farm, we have to load them on a truck.

Every time you have to load an animal, it exerts some form of stress on them. We limit the amount of stress on moving days by starting early in the morning on the hot summer days, only using rattle paddles for encouragement (not electric prods), and keeping our voices calm to help them stay calm.

Protection from the elements

As you may know, we do not have a barn for our cattle. This is mainly because cattle are naturally protected from the harsh winter elements. Their thick fur coats help to keep them warm and they also have the ability and instinctive knowledge to huddle together in a herd. When the weather calls for a heavy wind storm, we set up a windbreak to make sure they can get protection from the elements.

The same goes for the warm summer months when they shed their thick winter coats and know where to look for the coolest spots on the farm. We always try to find a shady spot for them to graze during the dog days of summer.

Land

Limited-tillage

We limit the amount of tillage we use between crops to allow the microbiology to survive in our soil. These tiny organisms cling to the roots of our plants and help them to bring in nutrients needed for life. By keeping the roots in the soil intact, we can also reduce the amount of erosion that happens during major weather events.

These microbes also need water and air to thrive. Soil with lots of pore space allows for both water and air to move into the root zone (like water flowing through a sponge). Tillage breaks up these pore spaces and collapses the soil structure, leading to less water and air and ultimately less microbiology.

Why not no-till?

We do as much no till as possible, however in some instances tillage is a necessary tool. We use tillage in ground we will plant potatoes in and also to establish new seedlings in organic fields.



Cover crops

Cover cropping is a farming practice that is used to keep living roots in the soil in between "cash crops". This cover crop helps to reduce erosion and compaction, as well as, builds soil fertility.

We typically plant multi-species cover crop which pulls nitrogen, carbon, and other important elements from the atmosphere into our soils. This biodiversity of species allows each plant to feed off one another and be utilized to the fullest extent.

Soil always wants to be covered by some type of living plant. If you take a drive throughout the countryside in the spring you can see a green hue over the brown corn and soybean stubble. These are weeds popping up trying to cover the soil. We plant cover crops in the fall, to keep the soil active and also eliminate the need for a spring herbicide spray.

See if you can pick out which fields are ours in the picture below!



Natural Amendments

Another trick we use to boost our soil health naturally is by using natural soil amendments. In unison with our other practices, we are able to increase fertility without harming our soil biology with synthetic nitrogen and fertilizers.

Some forms of natural amendments we use on our farm -
Liquid Humus
Compost
Animal Manure
Seaweed
Fish Oils
Molasses

These amendments are much easier for our plants to access compared to their synthetic counterparts, making it a much more effective solution for us.

Contrary to popular belief, there is plenty of fertility found in nature to grow profitable crops, we just need to equip our plants with the ability to bring it out of the atmosphere and into the soil.



Animal Impact

Putting animals back on our farm is arguably the best decision we have ever made.

Animals provide so many benefits to our farm it would be impossible to fit them all in this newsletter! Not counting their manure, they kickstart life in the soil, combat unwanted weeds without tillage or chemicals, and even their saliva has microbiology that goes into the soil and helps plants to grow. Crazy right?

By bringing animals back onto our farm, we have begun to close the nutrient gap of making our farm self sufficient. So many farmers rely on costly synthetic inputs to boost their soil health. If one of these inputs would become unavailable, our ability to produce food would be gone.

One ongoing example of this is the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge which shut down the Baltimore port. Most if not all of the synthetic fertilizer used in the eastern United States comes through this port. Now that the port is shut, fertilizer is much harder to find, making the price skyrocket.

By closing the nutrient gap, we are able to make our farm more resilient. This keeps us safe from relying solely on outside and often unreliable supply chains.

We take pride in being your farmer and we always want to strive to create healthier food for you and your family to enjoy.

I mean, that's why you're reading this blog right?

You are invested in becoming more informed and confident about the way your food is being produced. You understand that it's not just a label that says 100% grass-fed beef, or pasture-raised eggs, or organic, it's a product cared for by 3 generations working together with a common goal in mind.

To provide HEALTHY, SAFE, and BETTER food, from our family to yours.

Invest in your health today!

More from the blog

Hope for Farmers and Our Food in 2026!

2025 was a challenging year for most farmers in America. Input prices continued to rise, while commodity prices at which farmers sell their goods remain unchanged in our area and in many parts of the U.S. This, coupled with challenging weather patterns that have reduced yields, has caused many farmers to suffer.  According to the 2025 Agricultural Lender Survey, a survey sent to banks that lend to farmers nationwide, 93% of all banks expect farmer debt to increase over the next year. The National Corn Growers Association expects corn, our country's most prized crop, to net farmers a profit of -$0.85/bushel (Or an average loss of $150/acre). That’s correct: with current input costs subtracted from the price of the grain, most farmers will incur a loss on their corn crops.  Well, that’s just one crop, right? Wrong - Most farmers growing crops to sell at the commodity market will see very little or no margin of profit for their work this year. Next year doesn’t look much better either. So how did we get here?  Farming in history has always had good times and bad times. We hear in the Bible of the 7 years of bounty and 7 years of famine; the great potato famine of 1845; and, most recently, for the American farmer, the Dust Bowl. Most of these were caused by weather-related or natural factors; however, this time, it is a much deeper problem. Input costs for corn (on average in the U.S.)  have reached $897 per acre. This includes Chemicals, Fertilizer, Seed, Land Rent, Wages, and Equipment Costs. We observed a substantial increase in all of these costs first in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions on trade and future uncertainty led chemical and fertilizer manufacturers to raise prices, as most of the components of these products are imported.  The price of land and, subsequently, land rent have been on a constant rise forever. It has recently become a huge problem because the price has reached the point where farmers can no longer afford to purchase their own land. Their income from selling the crops and livestock they raise is insufficient to buy the land required to continue operations.  Who’s going to purchase farm land?  Enter the billionaires who now view farmland as a lucrative investment and are willing to pay substantial sums for it, thereby further inflating prices. As the price of farmland rises, land rent must also increase to cover the cost of the land. Increasing the farmers' cost per acre.  Farmers are earning less than ever, and they are receiving little cash for their crops. Here’s a chart of corn prices since 2000. As you can see, the price has experienced significant fluctuations but, overall, has increased little relative to the cost of growing corn.  Great, farmers are making less money than ever, but when I go to the grocery store, the cost of everything just keeps going up! What's the deal with that? Let us keep looking at it from the farmer's perspective to see what is happening. We’ll keep rolling with corn since that’s where we started, but the general idea can be put to any crop grown on a commodity scale. According to the USDA, here is how the corn grown in America is distributed. UsePercentage of Total Corn ProductionLivestock feed~37–40%Ethanol & byproducts~30–35%Exports~10–15%Food products~10%Seed & industrial~3–5% This chart shows that pigs, chickens, and cattle consume the largest quantities of corn grown in the United States.  A few major integrated buyers control more than 30% of all of the corn purchased for animal feed. These are companies like Perdue, Tyson, Cargill, Smithfield, and JBS. You’ve probably heard those names or eaten products from these companies a time or two. These integrators account for over 60% of all proteins consumed in the United States. This gives them control over not only the costs of products on supermarket shelves. They can always find ways to manufacture their product more cheaply, which entices consumers (not necessarily you, because you care about where your food comes from) to purchase it.  They know that a major input in the production of their product is corn, that it’s being overproduced, and that if they purchase enough of it, they can control the price they pay to farmers.  Every year, these integrators gain market share and strive to own more of the process, so ultimately they can have greater control over where the money goes. Let’s take a quick birds-eye view of how these vertical integrators got their start.  Around 1940, one of the first instances of integration occurred in poultry production when Arthur Perdue and his son, Frank, founded Perdue Farms. They saw a problem: chickens grew too slowly, didn’t taste good, and they were too expensive. He established his own breeding operation and persuaded farmers to raise his birds by contracting to purchase them back once they were full-grown.  This business model allowed farmers to assume much less risk in adopting new chicken breeds while allowing the Perdue family to capitalize on their hard work.  Their business gradually evolved into supplying farmers with everything they needed to raise birds. This was a significant relief for farmers, who could not manage the large market swings and rising input costs in the 70’s and 80’s.  From there, the business expanded into the processing and marketing of poultry to supermarkets and restaurants. From the farmers' perspective, it was a no-brainer to join. What had been a long, risky business of raising a bird and marketing it himself, hoping someone would buy it once fully grown, became a quick and easy way to generate cash flow and keep the family farm afloat.  The Cargills and what is now known as Smithfield, alongside a few others, quickly adopted the Perdue family business model, integrating the beef and pork industries into what we know today. Fortunately, beef is somewhat more challenging to integrate because of the long time required to raise a calf to slaughter. That does seem to be changing now as time goes on, but that’s a story for a different day. Back to the story at hand -  Since these integrators control the majority of the feed and, in turn, the majority of the market on which a corn farmer can sell their crops, they can control the price at which they choose to pay for it. Because there is excess corn production, they can be very stingy in setting their prices to ensure profitability.  So why don’t farmers just grow less corn? Well, it’s not that simple. In the eyes of the farmer, if the dollars per acre are getting smaller, the most obvious solution to keep the family business afloat is to plant more acres.  If you generate a profit of $10 per acre on all of your farm land, but only have 100 acres, that’s only $1,000 that you would have to reinvest back into your business; however, if you farm 10,000 acres, that yields $100,000 to reinvest in your business.  There is a real advantage in the commodity farming world to having more acres. You have more scale, which generally means your cost per acre decreases. This problem has been responsible for the dissolution of more than 140,000 farms during 2017-2022. That is a 7% drop, according to Northern Ag Network. As we’ve seen throughout history, the fewer hands that control, the more controlling those hands can be. How do we fix it? It is not a simple solution. If you wanted to start a farm, it would be nearly impossible without an enormous amount of cash on hand. There's a saying in the farming community that the best way to make a  million dollars farming is to start with two million. Which, if you're growing commodity crops, is probably true.  We were stuck on the commodity merry-go-round for years, but we have finally gotten off of it.  Here's how we did it.  To get a good picture of the history of our farm, we must go back about 150 years, when my great-great-grandfather began selling produce from his farm into the neighboring coal towns. He would load his wagon, which eventually became a truck, and go door to door, selling the crops he grew. The wives of the miners could not grow the food needed to keep their growing families' bellies full, so they relied on the farmer to keep the pantry full.  This was a sound and substantial business model for over 80 years, continuing until my grandfather’s time on the farm. During my grandfather’s tenure on the farm, he observed a shift toward people choosing to go to the grocery store rather than wait for the farmer to deliver. Culture was shifting. Coal was running out in these towns, and new mining practices meant that the next generation had to leave to find jobs. Many women worked in factories during World War II, and some of them stayed to help provide for their families. The grocery store offered something they couldn’t get from personal door delivery from farmers. You could get all of your goods at one spot, rather than waiting all day at home, hoping not to miss your butcher, milk man, or farmer.  My grandpa saw this cultural shift and knew he needed to shift too to keep the farm afloat. We began growing produce and selling it directly to the grocery stores.  This was a great business at first. Slow and expensive transportation meant it was best for grocers to purchase food locally. They supported their farmers in ways that now seem crazy. Grandpa describes the times when potatoes were plentiful, when produce managers would run sales and work with the farmers to move their product.   Like all good things, this came to an end. Advancements in transportation and economies of scale took over. Farmers in areas with better, more controlled climates and fertile soils could produce crops more efficiently and at a lower cost than we can. The biggest change came when the federal water projects built the infrastructure needed to irrigate the previously desert-like climate. Farmers could now perfectly time when the crops get water, giving the best environment to grow a higher-yielding crop. Pair that with the advancements in the transportation industry that made it relatively cheap, it is a no-brainer for the grocery store to buy its produce from farther away at a lower price. We played the commodity game for 50 years. By then, we were tired of it. There will always be a farm bigger than yours that can do things more economically. Let's face it, most businessmen in corporate America care about one thing: cost. So they will always ride the cheap hand.  Competing on price left our farm depleted. Economically, emotionally, and environmentally. We knew we needed to change, we just weren't sure how. Looking backwards, we admired our forefathers' ability to connect with the people who actually ate their food.  We decided to throw our hands up, waive the white flag on the commodity game, and get closer to our customers. Although very scary and uncertain at the time, it was one of the best decisions we ever made on our farm.  We began by growing specialty potatoes, allowing us to sell them at a higher price. It was challenging to find customers and manage the systems required to produce and distribute this special potato, but ultimately it yielded higher margins and profit per acre.  This margin gave us flexibility to try new approaches. We began covercropping and no-tilling in between potato crops. All things that improved our land. Although we still were not selling our crops directly to the end consumer, we were much closer to them.  We still wanted to make our land and business better, so we really jumped off the deep end and added livestock back to the mix. For the first time in over 50 years, we had cattle on our farm. Like most things, the first year was an abject disaster. With persistence and patience, we finally got the hang of it. In 2020, we started the journey of something we’ve been dreaming of for years. Selling the food we grow, directly off the farm and into the hands of the families who will be eating it. It has meant so much more to our farm than we ever could have imagined.  It has given us freedom from the constraints of the commodity market. It has also allowed us to become better farmers. We get to talk directly with you, and learn what you are concerned about and ultimately, what we can do to help alleviate those concerns, whether it is what we feed our animals, put in our soils, or simply how we farm. This connection has given us the perspective of someone looking from the outside in, something that was very hard to come by when selling to a few big customers. Why aren’t more farms doing what we did and leaving the commodity world? There are lots of factors that go into it. First, it requires a desire for change. It can be terrifying deciding to turn away from something you’ve known and done for years. The average age of farmers in the U.S. is 58 years old, according to the 2022 census. How much changing do you really want to do when you're 7 years away from retirement? It’s the next generation taking over these farms that will need to change to keep the business going.  Some farms have already begun implementing the change. It is interesting, at least in our area, that more farmers are starting to adopt the idea of getting closer to their customers. I look forward to seeing what farms look like in 10-15 years.  The government, although it is trying to help farmers in a time of need, has not been doing farmers any favors. Most government subsidies and aid for farmers have been propping up a broken system. It would be desirable if farmers could afford to be in business and would not have to rely on external funds just to keep feeding our country.  So what can you do to help? Well, you’ve already started the first step! Educate yourself on where your food comes from. To truly make a difference, get closer to your farmer and the land where your food comes from.  I talk with many people, farmers and non-farmers alike, and some think that if we could just get the right individual in a political office, our farms and food would be much better off. While this is true to an extent, there is only so much one person can do.  You, alongside millions of other families concerned about the safety and stability of our food, have the opportunity to make a difference every time you choose your meal. By purchasing food that is closer to the farm, more of it will go to the farmer and be reinvested in our land and local community.  At first glance, it may be more expensive and time-consuming to shop from farms rather than the supermarket, but it will be well worth your while in the difference it will make in your health, your community, and the next generation.  I would like to conclude with this thought. Cambridge University recently surveyed families who purchase food from farmers to identify the most significant barriers to sourcing food right off the farm. The responses were as I would have imagined, with cost and availability being at the top of the list. To me, this is a relative problem.  Looking back to the founding of the United States, consider how much of our resources (time and money) were spent on obtaining food.  Pretty much, I’d think. I’d venture to say easily over 50% but probably closer to 60% or 70%. Today, the median household income for a family is right around $130,000. If they take home $100,000/year (after taxes) and spend 25% of that on food, you’d have around $70/day to spend on food for your family. From our farm, to get a good crockpot dinner shipped to you, you’d pay approximately $41.50. $36.00 for the Chuck Roast, $3.00 for the spuds, $1.50 for carrots (supplied from another local farm), and $1.00 for spices. For a family of 4, this would be plenty to fill everyone’s plate for one night and even give leftovers for the next day! I don’t mean to be naive in saying this, because I do understand things are a lot different in today’s world. The settlers didn’t have to pay a mortgage, enroll the children in a good daycare, or have a car payment. But think of all of the good food and local businesses we could support if we would just put a few more resources into where our food comes from.  We believe that food is an investment not only in your health but also in your community. The choices you make in where you source your food have some of the most significant effects on the environment, economy, and the lives of farmers who hope to continue their legacy.  All farmers deep down have a desire to feed people. It’s you, the customer, who can choose to support farms that want to support you. In doing so, you can give more farmers hope, trust, and encouragement to continue, and help them adjust their farms to improve. Better for them, better for you, and better for the world.  Get out and find a farmer to support today. We’d love it if you’d join us, but there are also lots of other great farmers who would love to help you put good food that you can be proud of on your table.  Encourage your friends and family to do the same, and as a community, we can set the next generation up with a better environment, a connection to their food, and a better life for both farmers and food eaters! 

PCOS Medication for Chickens?

While scrolling through one of my subscribed bi-weekly AG E-Newsletters, a headline caught my eye - “Chicken or the egg (or the drug)?  - Research shows that a common diabetes medication for humans (metformin) can help broiler breeder hens produce more eggs.” I was sitting across from my brother John, and words came out of my mouth that resembled something like, “What in the world are they giving to our chickens now?!?”  As he is subscribed to the same newsletter and is a little more organized than I am, he already read the article; he just smirked. Once I finished reading the article, we discussed whether we thought this was a good idea or not; you can probably guess our opinions. In summary, the article says researchers at Penn State have discovered that metformin, a medication commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in humans, can significantly enhance egg production in broiler breeder hens. In a 40-week study, hens administered a small daily dose of metformin laid more fertile eggs, showed reduced body fat, and showed healthier reproductive hormone levels than untreated hens.  The study revealed that metformin influences liver gene activity, increasing the production of yolk proteins and stabilizing blood sugar levels while decreasing genes associated with fat accumulation. These effects mirror metformin's action in humans, where it improves insulin sensitivity and hormonal balance. Penn State This research suggests that metformin could be a tool in poultry farming, potentially extending the productive laying period of hens, reducing flock turnover, and enhancing overall farm efficiency. Significantly, metformin is rapidly metabolized in hens, thus they claim, minimizing any risk to the food supply. (Here’s a link to the full article) If you read the article closely, you can see that this medication is NOT being used and has yet to enter our food system. However, it is a good example of how the American ag industry can create its own problem and solve it by throwing a drug or chemical at it. Let me put this in simpler terms and use the example of Metformin in chicken production. How Big Ag Views the Dilemma Problem: Broiler Chickens do not lay enough eggs, and we can make more money if they lay longer and more fertile eggs. (It will take fewer momma chickens) Solution: Give chickens drugs that affect their hormones, enhancing their egg-laying abilities. Here’s How We View the Dilemma Problem: Broiler Chickens do not lay enough eggs, and we can make more money if they lay longer and more fertile eggs. Solution: Don’t grow chickens unnaturally fast! The issue is that we’ve bred our livestock and crops to grow so fast and so large for the sake of “efficiency” that we’ve become too reliant on drugs and chemicals to keep up with this fast-paced farming method.  Chickens, for instance, used to take 16-20 weeks to reach their market weight; now, they are bred to reach market weight in about 6 weeks! This rapid development causes the chickens to grow unnaturally fast, which has significant side effects for both the chicken and the person.  Things have developed too far for the case of efficiency in our food system.  Statements like this tend to give rise to many arguments, mainly along the lines of There are not enough farmers to produce all of the food.It’s not good for the animals to be out in the open without antibiotics.We can’t grow enough food to feed the world. 1) There are not enough farmers to produce all of the food -  Let’s start by looking at the farmers. In 1776, 90-95% of Americans were farmers. They grew all of the food they needed to survive. Most people had their own garden or small livestock herd. Now, around 1.3% of the population in America are farmers, with the number declining every day. So, how did we get here? Once cities and populations began to grow, it became increasingly desirable for people to hone in on one skill and trade it with others to make the community thrive. (For example, blacksmith, cobbler, preacher, builder, farmer) Most people traded their services and goods within 10 miles of where they lived. This built strong community ties and a willingness to work together.  Eventually, the Industrial Revolution came along and built faster transport, better equipment, and communication. Businesses could trade their goods over a farther distance. This new ability to market to larger numbers of people started the corporatization of the American Farm.  Farming became more efficient after World War 2 with the use of chemicals, tractors, and bigger equipment, which meant that those who were the best marketers, and could sell the most, had the most money to buy new farms and plant more crops. They could afford to buy up bigger and better equipment and land, and in turn, could grow more food cheaply. This caused prices to drop, and the little farmers could not keep up. If we exclude the less than 10-acre farms (which are still vital but don’t make up for a large portion of food eaten in America), we can see that in 1920 the average farm size was 148 acres, whereas in 2022 the average size was 1500 acres! A 1000% increase in size!  This shows the devastating number of farms and farming families forced to shut down their tractors to make room for these big farms. To grow food in a more natural way, we would need more farmers, each with a common goal to feed the world with good food. 2) It’s not good for the animals to be out in the open without antibiotics We will not spend much time on the next argument, which is that it’s inhumane for animals to be raised without the use of antibiotics and drugs. I somewhat agree with this argument. Let me explain. It would be inhumane for us to raise animals in a confinement system without the use of these drugs. All of the animals would be sick and more than likely die, simply because they were not designed to be grown in this manner. At Red Hill Harvest, we believe that God designed animals to be raised outdoors without antibiotics or drugs. When raised in the pasture, there is a much lower risk of getting and sharing diseases because they are never over their manure for more than one day and do not breathe and share the same air. In the case of a confined animal operation, it might actually be more ethical to have lab-grown meat. I don’t see much difference between raising chickens in a barn, where they are kept in a very crowded environment and only fed a specific ration of feed (not free choice), and in a “lab” where the meat is being manufactured. 3) We can’t grow enough food to feed the world. The final argument that we will not be able to grow enough food is simply untrue. Many farms, especially where we live, simply are not suited to have crops grown on them. Rather than increasing a subpar crop of corn and soybeans, we could grow a bountiful crop of grass and other high-quality forages and walk the animals to the feed. (You would also eliminate the need for heavy machinery and help the environment tremendously.) How much sense does it make for us to grow feed, harvest it, truck it, store it, re-truck it, grind it, haul it back to the farm, and finally feed it to an animal?  We recently bought a piece of land that was about 60 acres in total. On the sale bill, it said 40 acres were tillable and around 20 acres were wooded. Really, there are about 5 acres that we consider “tillable” that would produce a decent crop. Rather than trying to grow a grain crop, we let it grow and turn into grass. Then our cows can walk across the steep hills and valleys without causing harm to our machinery or the land. This way, we can utilize all 60 acres (yes, we even let the cows graze the woods when it gets hot) and still produce tons of feed! Way more than we could ever grow if we were to try to plant row crops. It all comes down to the fact that there are no longer enough farmers. Feeding the animals right off the land requires more management and labor to set up fences and work with the animals. With the current number of farmers in America, it would be challenging to scale back to a manageable size. How can we solve the problems in our food system? I believe it would be very difficult to emerge from the hole we have dug as a society. Farms are controlled by so few people that it would be hard to attract new farmers and start more farms. It would mean promoting and helping new farmers buy land, meaning the large corporations would have to dissolve. I don’t know what you think, but I don’t see that happening without significantly disrupting our food system.  You CAN make a difference, however. You can control how your food is produced by choosing where you source your food. A growing number of people are fed up with the current food system and how things are being raised. Things will change if we all join together and make smart decisions in choosing where we source our food. While there are many promising things happening at the government level to promote healthy and sustainable farming practices, it’s not enough.  If we reject food from the corporate world, and support small farms and farmers who raise their products the way you want them to, we can make a change.  I hope that the last paragraph encouraged you to start making a difference. Money controls politicians and businessmen alike, and where you choose to spend it will shape the course of our future.  With the developments of social media and websites, you can see exactly how your food is produced without even setting foot on a farm! You can reconnect with your farmer, reject the highly industrialized, unethical farming method, and support a farm that wants to support your health!