Tariffs: How they will affect meat prices, our farm, and how you can protect yourself from higher prices!

written by

Nathan Masser

posted on

April 11, 2025

Tariffs...

You're not alone if you didn’t know what that word meant a month ago. But now, it seems like every time you turn on the news or open up Facebook, that word is somewhere in the headline. 

We’ve recently had a few people ask us how tariffs will affect our prices and what they should expect from our farm. As farmers who care about what our customers are concerned about, we’ve decided it’s time to share our thoughts on how tariffs might affect meat prices in general, how they will affect our farm, and how you can protect yourself from the uncertainty of what lies ahead!

First, a brief disclaimer: This blog post is written by farmers, not politicians, economists, or financial advisors. These are our thoughts and opinions about what might happen, not what will happen. 

Our goal with this blog is not to be political or start an argument about whether tariffs are right or wrong. We want to share the little bit we know to help you be better informed about how your food gets to your plate. 

With all of that out of the way, let’s get started!

How tariffs might affect meat prices - 

Most ranchers and farmers (in America) sell their products at the “Market Price”. This market price is controlled by a few factors: supply and demand, government policy, futures speculation, and global trade. Once the market price is established and the farmer is paid, meat packers and grocery stores will each add their cut until the final retail price you see at the store is presented. As expected, tariffs on imported goods will likely affect the final retail price (Good or Bad).

It is estimated that 91% of Beef, 90% of Pork, and 98% of Chicken consumed in the U.S.A. is raised domestically. The remaining percentage of meat consumed often comes to America in the form of very lean, ground meat to blend with our rich meat and serve as patties and chicken nuggets at restaurants. Contrary to popular belief, most of it DOES NOT end up on supermarket shelves.

America exports around 14% of all the beef we produce, 24% of all pork, and nearly 20% of all chicken. If you do some simple math, you can easily see that we grow enough meat to replace the amounts imported from other countries to supply ourselves with food. So, we're sustainable for supply and demand from a strictly numerical standpoint.

However, if we investigate this topic further, you will find some reasons for concern and why a price spike may be imminent. While America produces enough meat, we do not grow it cheaply.

Let’s take beef, for instance. As I said before, 9% of all beef consumed in the United States is imported, primarily as lean ground beef from Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil. 

Naturally, this product is less valuable than many of the high-value cuts we export. Since our environment is better suited to growing healthier and higher-quality animals than these countries (yet we consume large amounts of ground beef as a country) it makes sense to import the cheap cuts that the consumer wants and export the higher-value cuts that are hard to sell. 

Hence, it leads us to the direct point for a price change. Every product plays a specific role in the supply chain. It would be nearly impossible for farmers and butchers to grind those high-value cuts and offer them at the same price as the lean ground beef that restaurants are using for their burgers, while being able to stay in business. Oftentimes, the margins are so slim in the livestock world that little bubbles and changes mean the difference between sinking or swimming.

Another significant factor that must be considered when determining the impact of tariffs on the price of meat is the input costs associated with raising animals. For animals, this means feed.

Most of the main ingredients in commercial feed, A.K.A. (Corn and Soy), are grown domestically. However, there are a lot of specialty feed input imports that make up the rest of the total daily rations for animal feed in our country.  

High protein seed meals like canola or peanut meal are often imported from Canada and South America for cattle and swine feed use. In other cases, during droughts (which the western U.S. faces right now), our country imports large amounts of hay from Spain and Chile to feed our beef herds.

Any increase in these input costs would likely be put on the backs of the farmers first, and then the end consumer. Based on the previous history of farms in America, the small, family operations that take deep pride in producing a quality product will be replaced by larger “corporate” farms whose primary goal is making a greater profit. Once the majority of the food being produced gets into so few hands, it will be much easier for the prices to become lopsided and exaggerated.

Other price increases these tariffs may cause in large-scale agriculture include the price of many conventional fertilizers used to fertilize the feed grown in the United States, the chemicals used to prevent weeds and pests from entering the fields, and the equipment used to harvest the fields. 

There are some areas for concern in the large-scale beef industry. Much of the outcome has yet to be seen, however, and it’s this uncertainty that causes much heartache and stress for everyone involved. As part of our goal of helping you be confident in the food you put on your table, let’s look at how tariffs will affect our farm!  

Hompage-cow-(1).jpg



How tariffs will affect our farm - 

A couple of ways we operate our farm allow us to be insulated from these highly volatile market prices. We can do this by limiting our reliance on outside inputs and, most importantly, building a relationship with you, our customer.

Red Hill Farms is continually striving to be 100% self-sufficient. What does that mean?

Our goal is to one day not rely on any resources not found on our farm to produce food from our land. By relying on nature and allowing our soil to work as intended, we can pull nutrients from the environment and make them available to our crops and livestock. Hence, the need for chemicals and synthetic fertilizers imported from other countries is drastically reduced. 

We’ve already started doing this! For instance, this year, we plan to use only 20% of the same chemicals and synthetic fertilizers we used in 2010. We can help our soil thrive by encouraging microbiology in the soil to take the nutrients already found in the atmosphere and pump them into the roots of our crops. A couple of key practices we implement to help this natural process are - 

Reduced tillage - We limit our tillage to keep the roots in the soil intact, which gives microbiology a place to live.

Limited to No Chemicals - Chemicals and synthetic fertilizers often harm our soil biology, which is one of the reasons why we are currently transitioning our whole farm to Certified Organic. 

Animal Impact - Using animals, we can speed up the decomposition of plant material and give the microbiology more food and places to live.

By relying on our soil's microbiology and how we manage our farm (all things we can control), we can significantly reduce our reliance on outside inputs. While the way we farm limits our efficiencies—or at least how "Big Ag" describes them—and in some ways costs more than producing in a conventional system, the less money we spend on outside inputs, the more protected and stable price we can offer you, our customer. 

Since we’re on that note, another way we insulate ourselves from these ever-changing prices is by building a relationship with you, our customer. 

In the past, our farm would “market” and sell all of the goods produced on our farm through grocery stores and wholesalers. This was an ideal way to move many products with limited time spent marketing and telling you about our products, bringing the products to customers on our end. However, we relied too much on the market price, which can quickly turn a very profitable crop into a cheap money negative crop, depending on yields and prices from neighboring states and countries. 

By building a relationship with you, we can examine our products directly and determine what it costs to grow them when setting our price. We pride ourselves on transparency in everything we do, including our pricing. 

Just 2 months ago, we increased our beef prices, not due to tariffs or any political changes, but due to the rising costs of raising beef. One of our main input costs while raising beef is the cost of replacement (feeder) cattle. When we send an animal to the butcher to turn it into delicious and nutritious food, we have to replace it with a smaller animal so that we will have another animal to sell again in a couple of months. The price of these replacement cattle has skyrocketed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, more importantly, the drought in the west that we have previously discussed. 

The animals we get are born out on the pasture, and rely on grass to have enough of their mom’s milk to grow. The farmers who raise these calves see no rain in the forecast and choose not to keep so many momma cows because they cannot feed them all. From there, it's simple math: with fewer momma cows = fewer baby cows = fewer feeder cows, ultimately leading to higher prices. It’s all supply and demand. If it were to begin raining today, this ripple in the supply will take years due to how long it takes to raise a calf until it is ready to be bred and give birth. (Approximately 2 years from the day it is born until it can give birth to its first calf)

We are trying to counteract this ever-increasing cost of replacements by birthing these replacement cows on our farm to have less reliance on the “market price”. The only issue is, it’s not as simple as it sounds. We still have to feed another herd of moma cows alongside our finishing herd, and we hold the risk of losing the cow throughout its entire 2.5-3 year life, not just through the last 16 months that it resides on our farm.

However, we see the considerable benefit of more market protection when raising our calves, and we are rapidly moving toward starting a momma cow herd. 

That was a long explanation of why our beef prices are what they are. While being 100% self-sufficient and not using any outside inputs is virtually impossible (ex: employees, butchering, packaging, and other things that are too difficult to grow), we can insulate ourselves from the outside prices by relying on ourselves and not government and outside intervention. Another way we can insulate ourselves is by connecting with our customers.

We connect with our customers by allowing folks to visit our farm, see how we do things, and by encouraging questions. You deserve to know how your food is being raised, and we want to show you. Today, we can share how we grow food on our farm with social media, our website, and good old-fashioned face-to-face conversations.

Our goal in becoming 100% self-sufficient and building a relationship with our customers is driven by the main idea that we no longer want to be controlled by outside prices and people who aren’t involved in our farm. We want to not only be able to farm the way we want to farm, but we also want to involve you in our farm, and ultimately, to create a better future for everyone involved.

Wagon-(1).jpg


So, what should you do to protect yourself from higher food prices?

Here’s a link to our online store, where you can get all of our products delivered right to your door, and all your problems will be solved!

Just kidding!

The best thing you can do is get closer to your food. What do I mean by that?

Many farms are local to you and want to get to know you better and serve their products right to you. Many of us farmers will gladly take the time to show you around our farms or answer any questions about why things are done the way they are. In our experience, these questions help us think deeper about our methods and practices and how we can change to produce a better end product! Buy directly from these farmers who care about you. Don’t force them to sell their products at the market price where they can barely break even. 

Some farmers choose not to sell their products directly and don’t want to build customer relationships, and that’s okay. However, I strongly encourage you to find a farmer who values you and your desires. They will produce their food with you in mind.



In closing, it is often said, “You hold more power in your wallet than you do at the voting booth.” I believe that statement couldn’t be truer.

You can change this world by choosing where you spend your money. If you support local farms, many of which help other small local businesses, you can protect yourself and others from these highly volatile and seemingly ever-changing prices. Thus, it gives you peace of mind that you will continue to have the ability to eat meat, the most nutrient-dense food on the planet!

Make a difference in the world, and source your food from local farmers who care about you! 



Shop food from local farmers, who care!






Helpful links used in writing this BLOG - 

https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-...

https://www.fsis.usda.gov/insp...

https://www.statista.com/topic...

https://www.usimportdata.com/b...

https://www.usmef.org/export-d...

https://usmef.org/export-data/...

https://www.nationalbeefwire.c...

https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-...

https://www.tendata.com/blogs/...

https://www.shipit.com/post/an...

https://www.afia.org/feedfacts...

More from the blog

PCOS Medication for Chickens?

While scrolling through one of my subscribed bi-weekly AG E-Newsletters, a headline caught my eye - “Chicken or the egg (or the drug)?  - Research shows that a common diabetes medication for humans (metformin) can help broiler breeder hens produce more eggs.” I was sitting across from my brother John, and words came out of my mouth that resembled something like, “What in the world are they giving to our chickens now?!?”  As he is subscribed to the same newsletter and is a little more organized than I am, he already read the article; he just smirked. Once I finished reading the article, we discussed whether we thought this was a good idea or not; you can probably guess our opinions. In summary, the article says researchers at Penn State have discovered that metformin, a medication commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in humans, can significantly enhance egg production in broiler breeder hens. In a 40-week study, hens administered a small daily dose of metformin laid more fertile eggs, showed reduced body fat, and showed healthier reproductive hormone levels than untreated hens.  The study revealed that metformin influences liver gene activity, increasing the production of yolk proteins and stabilizing blood sugar levels while decreasing genes associated with fat accumulation. These effects mirror metformin's action in humans, where it improves insulin sensitivity and hormonal balance. Penn State This research suggests that metformin could be a tool in poultry farming, potentially extending the productive laying period of hens, reducing flock turnover, and enhancing overall farm efficiency. Significantly, metformin is rapidly metabolized in hens, thus they claim, minimizing any risk to the food supply. (Here’s a link to the full article) If you read the article closely, you can see that this medication is NOT being used and has yet to enter our food system. However, it is a good example of how the American ag industry can create its own problem and solve it by throwing a drug or chemical at it. Let me put this in simpler terms and use the example of Metformin in chicken production. How Big Ag Views the Dilemma Problem: Broiler Chickens do not lay enough eggs, and we can make more money if they lay longer and more fertile eggs. (It will take fewer momma chickens) Solution: Give chickens drugs that affect their hormones, enhancing their egg-laying abilities. Here’s How We View the Dilemma Problem: Broiler Chickens do not lay enough eggs, and we can make more money if they lay longer and more fertile eggs. Solution: Don’t grow chickens unnaturally fast! The issue is that we’ve bred our livestock and crops to grow so fast and so large for the sake of “efficiency” that we’ve become too reliant on drugs and chemicals to keep up with this fast-paced farming method.  Chickens, for instance, used to take 16-20 weeks to reach their market weight; now, they are bred to reach market weight in about 6 weeks! This rapid development causes the chickens to grow unnaturally fast, which has significant side effects for both the chicken and the person.  Things have developed too far for the case of efficiency in our food system.  Statements like this tend to give rise to many arguments, mainly along the lines of There are not enough farmers to produce all of the food.It’s not good for the animals to be out in the open without antibiotics.We can’t grow enough food to feed the world. 1) There are not enough farmers to produce all of the food -  Let’s start by looking at the farmers. In 1776, 90-95% of Americans were farmers. They grew all of the food they needed to survive. Most people had their own garden or small livestock herd. Now, around 1.3% of the population in America are farmers, with the number declining every day. So, how did we get here? Once cities and populations began to grow, it became increasingly desirable for people to hone in on one skill and trade it with others to make the community thrive. (For example, blacksmith, cobbler, preacher, builder, farmer) Most people traded their services and goods within 10 miles of where they lived. This built strong community ties and a willingness to work together.  Eventually, the Industrial Revolution came along and built faster transport, better equipment, and communication. Businesses could trade their goods over a farther distance. This new ability to market to larger numbers of people started the corporatization of the American Farm.  Farming became more efficient after World War 2 with the use of chemicals, tractors, and bigger equipment, which meant that those who were the best marketers, and could sell the most, had the most money to buy new farms and plant more crops. They could afford to buy up bigger and better equipment and land, and in turn, could grow more food cheaply. This caused prices to drop, and the little farmers could not keep up. If we exclude the less than 10-acre farms (which are still vital but don’t make up for a large portion of food eaten in America), we can see that in 1920 the average farm size was 148 acres, whereas in 2022 the average size was 1500 acres! A 1000% increase in size!  This shows the devastating number of farms and farming families forced to shut down their tractors to make room for these big farms. To grow food in a more natural way, we would need more farmers, each with a common goal to feed the world with good food. 2) It’s not good for the animals to be out in the open without antibiotics We will not spend much time on the next argument, which is that it’s inhumane for animals to be raised without the use of antibiotics and drugs. I somewhat agree with this argument. Let me explain. It would be inhumane for us to raise animals in a confinement system without the use of these drugs. All of the animals would be sick and more than likely die, simply because they were not designed to be grown in this manner. At Red Hill Harvest, we believe that God designed animals to be raised outdoors without antibiotics or drugs. When raised in the pasture, there is a much lower risk of getting and sharing diseases because they are never over their manure for more than one day and do not breathe and share the same air. In the case of a confined animal operation, it might actually be more ethical to have lab-grown meat. I don’t see much difference between raising chickens in a barn, where they are kept in a very crowded environment and only fed a specific ration of feed (not free choice), and in a “lab” where the meat is being manufactured. 3) We can’t grow enough food to feed the world. The final argument that we will not be able to grow enough food is simply untrue. Many farms, especially where we live, simply are not suited to have crops grown on them. Rather than increasing a subpar crop of corn and soybeans, we could grow a bountiful crop of grass and other high-quality forages and walk the animals to the feed. (You would also eliminate the need for heavy machinery and help the environment tremendously.) How much sense does it make for us to grow feed, harvest it, truck it, store it, re-truck it, grind it, haul it back to the farm, and finally feed it to an animal?  We recently bought a piece of land that was about 60 acres in total. On the sale bill, it said 40 acres were tillable and around 20 acres were wooded. Really, there are about 5 acres that we consider “tillable” that would produce a decent crop. Rather than trying to grow a grain crop, we let it grow and turn into grass. Then our cows can walk across the steep hills and valleys without causing harm to our machinery or the land. This way, we can utilize all 60 acres (yes, we even let the cows graze the woods when it gets hot) and still produce tons of feed! Way more than we could ever grow if we were to try to plant row crops. It all comes down to the fact that there are no longer enough farmers. Feeding the animals right off the land requires more management and labor to set up fences and work with the animals. With the current number of farmers in America, it would be challenging to scale back to a manageable size. How can we solve the problems in our food system? I believe it would be very difficult to emerge from the hole we have dug as a society. Farms are controlled by so few people that it would be hard to attract new farmers and start more farms. It would mean promoting and helping new farmers buy land, meaning the large corporations would have to dissolve. I don’t know what you think, but I don’t see that happening without significantly disrupting our food system.  You CAN make a difference, however. You can control how your food is produced by choosing where you source your food. A growing number of people are fed up with the current food system and how things are being raised. Things will change if we all join together and make smart decisions in choosing where we source our food. While there are many promising things happening at the government level to promote healthy and sustainable farming practices, it’s not enough.  If we reject food from the corporate world, and support small farms and farmers who raise their products the way you want them to, we can make a change.  I hope that the last paragraph encouraged you to start making a difference. Money controls politicians and businessmen alike, and where you choose to spend it will shape the course of our future.  With the developments of social media and websites, you can see exactly how your food is produced without even setting foot on a farm! You can reconnect with your farmer, reject the highly industrialized, unethical farming method, and support a farm that wants to support your health!

Are Antibiotics in Meat Harming Your Health?

Antibiotics have been used in commercial farming since 1948, but at what cost? While they help animals grow faster, they also raise serious concerns about antibiotic resistance, meat quality, and long-term health effects. Many conventional farms routinely give antibiotics to livestock, leaving trace residues in the meat we eat. But there’s a better way. At Red Hill Harvest, we take a different approach—raising animals on pasture, prioritizing their health naturally, and ensuring our meat is free from unnecessary antibiotics. Learn why choosing antibiotic-free meat matters for your health, the environment, and the quality of your food. Read on to uncover the truth.